出国留学网北美范文

出国留学网专题频道北美范文栏目,提供与北美范文相关的所有资讯,希望我们所做的能让您感到满意!

GRE北美范文:选修专业是否值得重视

 

  GRE词汇量大,阅读量大,写作难度也比较高,做事也总有方法,怎样取得GRE高分的作文呢。把难点逐个拿下,把GRE掌握在手中,就不怕不怕啦,写作不怕啦,阅读不怕啦,考试就不怕啦。下面是由出国留学网为您整理的GRE中的作文范文,《GRE北美范文:选修专业是否值得重视》。新GRE作文题库中什么类型的作文题目都存在,我们需要知道各方面的知识,看看范文也能从中获得帮助。

  GRE北美范文:选修专业是否值得重视

  "Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated."

  I fundamentally agree with the proposition that students must take courses outside their major field of study to become "truly educated." A contrary position would reflect a too narrow view of higher education and its proper objectives. Nevertheless, I would caution that extending the proposition too far might risk undermining those objectives.

  The primary reason why I agree with the proposition is that "me" education amounts to far more than gaining the knowledge and ability to excel in one's major course of study and in one's professional career. True education also facilitates an understanding of one- self, and tolerance and respect for the viewpoints of others. Courses in psychology, sociology, and anthropology all serve these ends. "True" education also provides insight and perspective regarding one's place in society and in the physical and metaphysical worlds. Courses in political science, philosophy, theology, and even sciences such as astronomy and physics...

GRE写作备考:gre满分作文北美范文全揭秘

01-17

标签: 北美 范文全

 本文主要讲解GRE作文相关内容,希望能帮助童鞋们提高写作能力。出国留学网liuxue86.com编辑部敬上。
gre满分作文北美范文全揭秘。学习GMAT/GRE写作往往离不开“北美范文”,但其中良莠不齐,并非篇篇能称之为“范”,毕竟它们不是ACT/ETS所钦定的文章。如此说来,Official Guide上的范文就弥足珍贵,无论6分的还是5分、4分的都要仔细分析,尤其是其中所给与的分析和评论更是要细细体味,领悟其精神,然后用心实践。

GRE下面是一篇官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文,我们来一起赏析,看看它为何能scored six (先读文章,再看我的点评)

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE 感谢您阅读《gre满分作文北美范文全揭秘 》一文,出国留学网(liuxue86.com)编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。本文主要讲解GRE作文相关内容,希望能帮助童鞋们提高写作能力。出国留学网liuxue86.com编辑部敬上。
GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not mak...

2012gre作文大讲堂:issue167范文北美范文

01-15

标签: 北美 范文

 本文主要讲解GRE作文相关内容,希望能帮助童鞋们提高写作能力。出国留学网liuxue86.com编辑部敬上。
issue167范文

"It is impossible for an effective political leader to tell the truth all the time. Complete honesty is not a useful virtue for a politician."

Is complete honesty a useful virtue in politics? The speaker contends that it is not, for the reason that political leaders must sometimes lie to be effective. In order to evaluate this contention it is necessary to examine the nature of politics, and to distinguish between shor-term and long-term effectiveness.

On the one hand are three compelling arguments that a political leader must sometimes be less than truthful in order to be effective in that leadership. The first argument lies in the fact that politics is a game played among politicians-and that to succeed in the game one must use the tools that are part-and-parcel of it. Complete forthrightness is a sign of vulnerability and naivete, neither of which will earn a politician respect among his or her opponents, and which those opponents will use to every advantage against the honest politician.

Secondly, it is crucial to distinguish between misrepresentation of factin other words, lies-and mere political rhetoric. The rhetoric of a successful politician eschews rigorous factual inquiry and indisputable fact while appealing to emotions, ideals, and subjective interpretation and characterizations. Consider, for example, a hypothetical candidate for political office who attacks the i...