出国留学网

目录

2013年英语一考研真题(完整版)

字典 |

2013-09-06 13:32

|

【 liuxue86.com - 考研英语真题 】

  Text 4

  On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.

  In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial . Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.

  Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held the

  congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.

  However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.

  Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.

  The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with .

  Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so. The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.

  36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

  [A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.

  [B] disturbed the power balance between different states.

  [C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.

  [D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.

  37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?

  [A] Federal officers’ duty to withhold immigrants’information.

  [B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.

  [C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.

  [D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.

  38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts

  [A] violated the Constitution.

  [B] undermined the states’ interests.

  [C] supported the federal statute.

  [D] stood in favor of the states.

  39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement

  [A] outweighs that held by the states.

  [B] is dependent on the states’ support.

  [C] is established by federal statutes.

  [D] rarely goes against state laws.

  40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?

  [A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.

  [B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.

  [C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.

  [D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

考研英语真题 考研数学真题
政治真题

专业课真题
英语一真题 英语二真题 数学一真题 数学二真题 数学三真题 数农真题
考研英语答案 考研数学答案
政治答案

专业课答案
英语一答案 英语二答案 数学一答案 数学二答案 数学三答案 数农答案

  想了解更多考研英语真题网的资讯,请访问: 考研英语真题

本文来源:https://www.liuxue86.com/a/1578855.html
考研院校库(挑大学·选专业)
院校搜索
专业查询
延伸阅读
考研频道为大家提供考研英语阅读理解真题三遍研究法提升英语正确率,一起来看看吧!更多考研资讯请关注我们网站的更新!考研英语阅读理解真题三遍研究法提升英语正确率英语阅读如何提升正确率一
2018-11-06
2019年考研英语真题是怎样的?小编为大家提供2019考研英语一真题,赶紧和小编一起来看看考研英语一真题吧!祝你一切顺利!2019考研英语一真题小编精心为您推荐:2019考研英语一
2018-12-23
今天小编为大家提供2019考研英语一真题及答案已公布,有兴趣的同学可以自己慢慢对答案,估测一下自己拿了多少分!祝你考试成功!2019考研英语一真题及答案已公布小编精心为您推荐:20
2018-12-23
截止到目前,2019年考研英语一真题及答案和2019年考研英语二真题及答案都已经公布,小编为大家提供2019考研英语真题及答案,希望大家喜欢!2019考研英语一真题及答案2019考
2018-12-23
考研频道为大家提供考研英语真题翻译词组汇总(1990-2008年),一起来复习一下吧!更多考研资讯请关注我们网站的更新!考研英语真题翻译词组汇总(1990-2008年)►1990年
2018-11-06
2019年考研英语二在12月22日已结束,小编为大家提供2019考研英语二真题及答案已公布,赶紧和小编一起来核对一下答案吧!希望你能考出优异的成绩!2019考研英语二真题及答案已公
2018-12-23